Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Surrogacy

As part of the health movement and the autonomous women’s movement, Sama has consistently campaigned against the medicalisation of women’s bodies in ways that are unethical, coercive, iniquitous, and harmful. While contraceptive technologies on the one hand prevent fertile women from having children, another set of technologies called Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ARTs) assist those who cannot conceive. Yet, both these technologies are similar in that they target women’s bodies by intervening in and altering the physiological processes. Sama is currently engaged with issues in ARTs, which have far reaching social, legal, medical and economic implications on women and on society as a whole. Sama’s work around ARTs is guided by the perspective that the interrelationship between reproductive technology and its end user is governed by gender, as well as by caste, class, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation and other axes of power.

As a phenomenon that thrives on the use of ARTs, commercial surrogacy in India and its exponential growth has drawn much attention and raised several ethical concerns. India’s fertility industry is an integral part of the country’s expanding medical market and medical (reproductive) tourism industry. Surrogacy in India had received an impetus by both domestic and international demand fuelled by low costs, lack of regulation of ART clinics, and easy availability of surrogate mothers and egg donors. Legal engagement with ARTs and surrogacy has evolved over the last decade and has recently culminated in the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016 which seeks to ban commercial surrogacy while permitting altruistic surrogacy among close relatives for heterosexual couples married for five years.  Sama’s work on ARTs and surrogacy, over the years, has examined the trope of motherhood from the perspective of medicalisation and vivisection.  We have sought to contextualize the issue, by linking the micro and macro realities through research, contributing to the academic discourse, and building advocacy by engaging with the policymakers and media.

Examining the Contested Political and Economic Landscape of Assisted Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Regulations in India

“Examining the Contested Political and Economic Landscape of Assisted Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Regulations in India” explores some of the critical discussions emerging after the passing of the Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Act and Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021. The article stresses the strengthening of cross movement collective action and upholding of reproductive rights and justice for all individuals. Continue reading

Reproductive labour in fertility markets: a new precariousness

In the context of an ongoing transnational reconfiguration of reproduction, emerging fertility markets based on assisted reproductive technologies and reproductive value chains shape new forms of labour, new labour relations and new subjectivities. Due to ethical considerations, many nation states restrict or ban certain reproductive technologies and waged reproductive labour. Often moral discourses, similar to those around sex work, and a discourse about the gift economy and altruism among women, obscure labour issues. Continue reading

Ethical Issues and Challenges in Research on Gender, Reproductive Technologies and Market

This article is part of the edited volume titled Ethics in Public Health Practice in India, edited by Arima Mishra and Kalyani Subbiah, and published by Springer Singapore in 2018. The chapter seeks to contextualize Sama’s work on assisted reproductive technologies and commercial surrogacy from a bioethical framework. Continue reading